Can the Oculus 2 with Passthrough API take the place of HoloLens 2. Checking the hypothesis
Oculus vs Hololens

After the MRTK library has been adapted to the Oculus Quest 2 and in the ver. 30 of the Operating system we received a pass-through feature, we decided to check if Oculus 2 could be used as an alternative to expensive HoloLens 2. To validate the idea, we’ve made two applications with the same features on the Oculus Quest 2 and on the HoloLens 2. You can see the result in the video at the end of the article.

Short introduction and comparison of headsets OQ2 vs HL2

For those who want to get more information on these devices, we have prepared a small review.

Oculus Quest 2

Oculus Quest 2

Oculus Quest 2 is a virtual reality (VR) headset created by Oculus, a brand of Facebook. As with its predecessor, the Quest 2 is capable of running both a standalone headset with an internal, Android-based operating system, and with Oculus-compatible VR software running on a desktop computer when connected over USB or Wi-Fi.

Hardware. The Quest 2 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 system-on-chip (which is part of a Snapdragon product line designed primarily for VR and augmented reality devices), with 6 GB of RAM — an increase of 2 GB over the first-generation model.

Its display is a singular fast-switch LCD panel with a 1832×1920 per eye resolution, which can run at a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz (an increase from 1440×1600 per-eye at 72 Hz). The headset includes physical interpupillary distance (IPD) adjustment at 58 mm, 63 mm and 68 mm, adjusted by physically moving the lenses into each position. This is also combined with software adjustment.

The included Oculus Touch controllers are slightly bigger, influenced by the original Oculus Rift’s controllers. Their battery life has also been increased four-fold over the controllers included with the first-generation Quest.

HoloLens 2

Hololens 2

The HoloLens 2 is a combination of waveguide and laser-based stereoscopic & full-color mixed reality smart glasses developed and manufactured jointly by Microsoft and MicroVision, Inc. in Redmond, Washington. It is the direct model successor to the pioneering Microsoft HoloLens and the technical successor to the MicroVision stereoscopic and monochromatic laser-based virtual retinal display (VRD) & helmet mounted display (HMD) prototype-in-the-running for the canceled RAH-66 Comanche stealth helicopter and the now-defunct monoscopic and monochromatic MicroVision Nomad Augmented Vision System.

Hardware. The HoloLens features an inertial measurement unit (IMU) (which includes an accelerometer, gyroscope, and a magnetometer) four “environment understanding” sensors (two on each side), an energy-efficient depth camera with a 120°×120° angle of view, a 2.4-megapixel photographic video camera, a four-microphone array, and an ambient light sensor.

The HoloLens contains an internal rechargeable battery, with average life rated at 2–3 hours of active use, or 2 weeks of standby time. The HoloLens can be operated while charging.

HoloLens features IEEE 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.1 Low Energy (LE) wireless connectivity. The headset uses Bluetooth LE to pair with the included Clicker, a thumb-sized finger-operating input device that can be used for interface scrolling and selecting. The Clicker features a clickable surface for selecting, and an orientation sensor which provides scrolling functions via tilting and panning of the unit. The Clicker features an elastic finger loop for holding the device, and a USB 2.0 micro-B plug socket for charging its internal battery.

HoloLens 2 and Oculus Quest 2 have different operating systems, provide different user experience and have different types of interaction with the system and world.

Development process

Developing applications for Oculus Quest 2 is based on the basic rules and best practices with specific oculus Quest side requirements using Unity engine. If we are talking about HoloLens 2, we have to develop an application for the Universal Windows Platform with specific restrictions and additional capabilities provided by Windows 10 Holographic operating system using the MRTK library provided by Microsoft.

Some time ago we found that the MRTK library has been adapted to the Oculus Quest 2 and we started using it in our projects. This library has a lot of prepared elements that save time for prototyping and development.

Passthrough API on Oculus Quest 2

In the ver. 30 of the Operating system we received a pass-through feature from Oculus Quest 2 that allows us to step outside your view in VR to see a real-time view of your surroundings. Passthrough uses the sensors on your headset to approximate what you would see if you were able to look directly through the front of your headset and into the real world around you. Taking into account these feature possibilities, we decided to check if Oculus could be used as an alternative to expensive HoloLens 2.

To validate the idea, we’ve made two applications with the same features on the Oculus Quest 2 and on the HoloLens 2. The result you can see in the video.

 

The summary

Oculus Quest cannot be used as an alternative to the HoloLens for our purpose. The pass-through feature is not the same as Mix Reality. The possibility to work in the real world with Oculus Quest is limited. Also, Oculus Quest has no camera for recognition of images or objects, Oculus Quest doesn’t have lidar or high resolution cameras because Oculus Quest is a B2C product, not a B2B product.

If you have tasks that are suitable for HoloLens 2, use it. Oculus Quest 2 provides some experience of HoloLens 2 usage but these experiences are too limited to make Oculus Quest 2 an alternative to HoloLens 2.

Latest Articles

June 27, 2025
Methodology of VR/MR/AR and AI Project Estimation

Estimation of IT projects based on VR, XR, MR, or AI requires both a deep technical understanding of advanced technologies and the ability to predict future market tendencies, potential risks, and opportunities. In this document, we aim to thoroughly examine estimation methodologies that allow for the most accurate prediction of project results in such innovative fields as VR/MR/AR and AI by describing unique approaches and strategies developed by Qualium Systems. We strive to cover existing estimation techniques used at our company and delve into the strategies and approaches that ensure high efficiency and accuracy of the estimation process. While focusing on different estimation types, we analyze the choice of methods and alternative approaches available. Due attention is paid to risk assessment being the key element of a successful IT project implementation, especially in such innovative fields as VR/MR/AR and AI. Moreover, the last chapter covers the demo of a project of ours, the Chemistry education app. We will show how the given approaches practically affect the final project estimation. Read

June 27, 2025
What Are Spatial Anchors and Why They Matter

Breaking Down Spatial Anchors in AR/MR Augmented Reality (AR) and Mixed Reality (MR) depend on accurate understanding of the physical environment to create realistic experiences, and they hit this target with the concept of spatial anchors. These anchors act like markers, either geometric or based on features, that help virtual objects stay in the same spot in the real world — even when users move around. Sounds simple, but the way spatial anchors are implemented varies a lot depending on the platform; for example, Apple’s ARKit, Google’s ARCore, and Microsoft’s Azure Spatial Anchors (ASA) all approach them differently. If you want to know how these anchors are used in practical scenarios or what challenges developers often face when working with them, this article dives into these insights too. What Are Spatial Anchors and Why They Matter A spatial anchor is like a marker in the real world, tied to a specific point or group of features. Once you create one, it allows for some important capabilities: Persistence. Virtual objects stay exactly where you placed them in the real-world, even if you close and restart the app. Multi-user synchronization. Multiple devices can share the same anchor, so everyone sees virtual objects aligned to the same physical space. Cross-session continuity. You can leave a space and come back later, and all the virtual elements will still be in the right place. In AR/MR, your device builds a point cloud or feature map by using the camera and built-in sensors like the IMU (inertial measurement unit). Spatial anchors are then tied to those features, and without them, virtual objects can drift or float around as you move, shattering the sense of immersion. Technical Mechanics of Spatial Anchors At a high level, creating and using spatial anchors involves a series of steps: Feature Detection & Mapping To start, the device needs to understand its surroundings: it scans the environment to identify stable visual features (e.g., corners, edges). Over time, these features are triangulated, forming a sparse map or mesh of the space. This feature map is what the system relies on to anchor virtual objects. Anchor Creation Next, anchors are placed at specific 3D locations in the environment in two possible ways: Hit-testing. The system casts a virtual ray from a camera to a user-tapped point, then drops an anchor on the detected surface. Manual placement. Sometimes, developers need precise control, so they manually specify the exact location of an anchor using known coordinates, like ensuring it perfectly fits on the floor or another predefined plane. Persistence & Serialization Anchors aren’t temporary — they can persist, and here’s how systems make that possible: Locally stored anchors. Frameworks save the anchor’s data, like feature descriptors and transforms, in a package called a “world map” or “anchor payload”. Cloud-based anchors. Cloud services like Azure Spatial Anchors (ASA) upload this anchor data to a remote server to let the same anchor be accessed across multiple devices. Synchronization & Restoration When you’re reopening the app or accessing the anchor on a different device, the system uses the saved data to restore the anchor’s location. It compares stored feature descriptors to what the camera sees in real time, and if there’s a good enough match, the system confidently snaps the anchor into position, and your virtual content shows up right where it’s supposed to. However, using spatial anchors isn’t perfect, like using any other technology, and there are some tricky issues to figure out: Low latency. Matching saved data to real-time visuals has to be quick; otherwise, the user experience feels clunky. Robustness in feature-scarce environments. Blank walls or textureless areas don’t give the system much to work with and make tracking tougher. Scale drift. Little errors in the system’s tracking add up over time to big discrepancies. When everything falls into place and the challenges are handled well, spatial anchors make augmented and virtual reality experiences feel seamless and truly real. ARKit’s Spatial Anchors (Apple) Apple’s ARKit, rolled out with iOS 11, brought powerful features to developers working on AR apps, and one of them is spatial anchoring, which allows virtual objects to stay fixed in the real world as if they belong there. To do this, ARKit provides two main APIs that developers rely on to achieve anchor-based persistence. ARAnchor & ARPlaneAnchor The simplest kind of anchor in ARKit is the ARAnchor, which represents a single 3D point in the real-world environment and acts as a kind of “pin” in space that ARKit can track. Building on this, ARPlaneAnchor identifies flat surfaces like tables, floors, and walls, allowing developers to tie virtual objects to these surfaces. ARWorldMap ARWorldMap makes ARKit robust for persistence and acts as a snapshot of the environment being tracked by ARKit. It captures the current session, including all detected anchors and their surrounding feature points, into a compact file. There are a few constraints developers need to keep in mind: World maps are iOS-only, which means they cannot be shared directly with Android. There must be enough overlapping features between the saved environment and the current physical space, and textured structures are especially valuable for this, as they help ARKit identify key points for alignment. Large world maps, especially those with many anchors or detailed environments, can be slow to serialize and deserialize, causing higher application latency when loading or saving. ARKit anchors are ideal for single-user persistence, but sharing AR experiences across multiple devices poses additional issues, and developers often employ custom server logic (uploading ARWorldMap data to a backend), enabling users to download and use the same map. However, this approach comes with caveats: it requires extra development work and doesn’t offer native support for sharing across platforms like iOS and Android. ARCore’s Spatial Anchors (Google) Google’s ARCore is a solid toolkit for building AR apps, and one of its best features is how it handles spatial anchors: Anchors & Hit-Testing ARCore offers two ways to create anchors. You can use Session.createAnchor(Pose) if you already know the anchor’s position, or…

June 2, 2025
Extended Reality in Industry 4.0: Transforming Industrial Processes

Understanding XR in Industry 4.0 Industry 4.0 marks a turning point in making industry systems smarter and more interconnected: it integrates digital and physical technologies like IoT, automation, and AI, into them. And you’ve probably heard about Extended Reality (XR), the umbrella for Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality. It isn’t an add-on. XR is one of the primary technologies making the industry system change possible. XR has made a huge splash in Industry 4.0, and recent research shows how impactful it has become. For example, a 2023 study by Gattullo et al. points out that AR and VR are becoming a must-have in industrial settings. It makes sense — they improve productivity and enhance human-machine interactions (Gattullo et al., 2023). Meanwhile, research by Azuma et al. (2024) focuses on how XR makes workspaces safer and training more effective in industrial environments. One thing is clear: the integration of XR into Industry 4.0 closes the gap between what we imagine in digital simulations and what actually happens in the real world. Companies use XR to work smarter — it tightens up workflows, streamlines training, and improves safety measures. The uniqueness of XR is in its immersive nature. It allows teams to make better decisions, monitor operations with pinpoint accuracy, and effectively collaborate, even if team members are on opposite sides of the planet. XR Applications in Key Industrial Sectors Manufacturing and Production One of the most significant uses of XR in Industry 4.0 is in manufacturing, where it enhances design, production, and quality control processes. Engineers now utilize digital twins, virtual prototypes, and AR-assisted assembly lines, to catch possible defects before production even starts. Research by Mourtzis et al. (2024) shows how effective digital twin models powered by XR are in smart factories: for example, studies reveal that adopting XR-driven digital twins saves design cycle times by up to 40% and greatly speeds up product development. Besides, real-time monitoring with these tools has decreased system downtimes by 25% (Mourtzis et al., 2024). Training and Workforce Development The use of XR in employee training has changed how industrial workers acquire knowledge and grow skills. Hands-on XR-based simulations allow them to practice in realistic settings without any of the risks tied to operating heavy machinery, whereas traditional training methods usually involve lengthy hours, high expenses, and the need to set aside physical equipment, disrupting operations. A study published on ResearchGate titled ‘Immersive Virtual Reality Training in Industrial Settings: Effects on Memory Retention and Learning Outcomes’ offers interesting insights on XR’s use in workforce training. It was carried out by Jan Kubr, Alena Lochmannova, and Petr Horejsi, researchers from the University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Czech Republic, specializing in industrial engineering and public health. The study focused on fire suppression training to show how different levels of immersion in VR affect training for industrial safety procedures. The findings were astounding. People trained in VR remembered 45% more information compared to those who went through traditional training. VR also led to a 35% jump in task accuracy and cut real-world errors by 50%. On top of that, companies using VR in their training programs noticed that new employees reached full productivity 25% faster. The study uncovered a key insight: while high-immersion VR training improves short-term memory retention and operational efficiency, excessive immersion — for example, using both audio navigation and visual cues at the same time — can overwhelm learners and hurt their ability to absorb information. These results showed how important it is to find the right balance when creating VR training programs to ensure they’re truly effective. XR-based simulations let industrial workers safely engage in realistic and hands-on scenarios without the hazards or costs of operating heavy machinery, changing the way they acquire new skills. Way better than sluggish, costly, and time-consuming traditional training methods that require physical equipment and significant downtime. Maintenance and Remote Assistance XR is also transforming equipment maintenance and troubleshooting. In place of physical manuals, technicians using AR-powered smart glasses can view real-time schematics, follow guided diagnostics, and connect with remote experts, reducing downtime. Recent research by Javier Gonzalez-Argote highlights how significantly AR-assisted maintenance has grown in the automotive industry. The study finds that AR, mostly mediated via portable devices, is widely used in maintenance, evaluation, diagnosis, repair, and inspection processes, improving work performance, productivity, and efficiency. AR-based guidance in product assembly and disassembly has also been found to boost task performance by up to 30%, substantially improving accuracy and lowering human errors. These advancements are streamlining industrial maintenance workflows, reducing downtime and increasing operational efficiency across the board (González-Argote et al., 2024). Industrial IMMERSIVE 2025: Advancing XR in Industry 4.0 At the Industrial IMMERSIVE Week 2025, top industry leaders came together to discuss the latest breakthroughs in XR technology for industrial use. One of the main topics of discussion was XR’s growing impact on workplace safety and immersive training environments. During the event, Kevin O’Donovan, a prominent technology evangelist and co-chair of the Industrial Metaverse & Digital Twin committee at VRARA, interviewed Annie Eaton, a trailblazing XR developer and CEO of Futurus. She shared exciting details about a groundbreaking safety training initiative, saying: “We have created a solution called XR Industrial, which has a collection of safety-themed lessons in VR … anything from hazards identification, like slips, trips, and falls, to pedestrian safety and interaction with mobile work equipment like forklifts or even autonomous vehicles in a manufacturing site.” By letting workers practice handling high-risk scenarios in a risk-free virtual setting, this initiative shows how XR makes workplaces safer. No wonder more companies are beginning to see the value in using such simulations to improve safety across operations and avoid accidents. Rethinking how manufacturing, training, and maintenance are done, extended reality is rapidly becoming necessary for Industry 4.0. The combination of rising academic study and practical experiences, like those shared during Industrial IMMERSIVE 2025, highlights how really strong this technology is. XR will always play a big role in optimizing efficiency, protecting workers, and…



Let's discuss your ideas

Contact us